New·Argos now detects usage deviation across 100+ model endpoints See how →
Home / Platform / Voyager
Platform

Voyager — coding agents make an engineer faster. Voyager makes a programme faster.

Programmes are slowed by unsigned specs, missing tests, integration surprises and a release process nobody trusts — not by typing speed. Voyager applies agents across the whole lifecycle and puts human gates where regulated enterprises need them.

The pipeline

Seven stages. Four human gates. One eval suite that never sleeps.

Every stage has an agent doing the volume work and a person doing the signing. The gates aren't ceremony — nothing moves without the signature, and the signature is logged for audit.

Gate

Intent

Sponsor states the outcome and owns the KPI.

Gate

Spec

Blueprint, data contracts, first evals. Signed.

Auto

Plan

Bounded tickets with test expectations and token budgets.

Gate

Build

Agents code and test; engineers review and merge.

Auto

Evaluate

Behaviour, safety and cost evals in CI. Regressions block.

Gate

Ship

Risk owner expands autonomy, stage by stage.

Auto

Observe

Production traces become new eval cases.

What's different

Built for places where “move fast” has to survive an audit.

Evals before code

The eval suite is drafted with the spec, including failure and abuse cases. Code is written to pass evals, not the other way round.

Bounded tickets

Build agents work in scopes small enough for a human to review properly. No thousand-line pull requests.

Cost is a test

A change that doubles inference cost per transaction fails the gate even if accuracy passes. Argos supplies the number.

Signatures are logged

Who signed the spec, who merged, who expanded autonomy and why — read straight into the board pack.

Legacy-aware

The Codebase Assessor maps the old system first. Agents wrap it safely rather than pretending it isn't there.

Yours afterwards

Specs, evals, pipelines and patterns are handed over. Your engineers run Voyager after we leave.

Measured on

What a Voyager pod reports every sprint.

  • Spec → shadow: days from signed spec to first shadow-mode run
  • Cycle time: ticket open to merged, with review time separated out
  • Defect escape rate: issues found in production per release
  • Cost per merged PR: tokens and compute, straight from Argos

On the clinical content engagement: twelve weeks from start to first production version, then shadow to approve mode as reviewer acceptance climbed.

Read that case study →
Guidelines per reviewer day and adoption
Let's talk

Tell us the number you need to move.

A 45-minute working session with an operator who has run the kind of work you are describing. You will get an honest read on where your programme stands and what it would take to move it.